the doubly disadvantaged

the issue of sex and race have been at the forefront of this past election. never before have we had the experience of having a black person and a woman named to both of the major party tickets in this country at the same time. while i was observing the celebrations of president obama's historic victory and reflecting on the fact that he earned 95% of the black vote, i was thinking about that crazy black woman from the democratic primaries who was crying about hillary's loss and saying she may not vote for the first time since she's been 18. without reliving the incredulity of the moment, i was moved to consider black women and their allegiances. we've been branded the "doubly disadvantaged" for being both a racial and sexual minority--the double layered glass ceiling, if you will. and i've had several interesting conversations with people about whether they consider themselves black first or a woman first.
personally, it has never been a hard decision for me--while my ancestors were being beaten and lynched, white women were sitting sipping lemonade on their slave-owner daddy's porches, sure they had their own issues, but far removed from the pains of being black in this nation founded on the premise of white superiority. this was made even clearer when i got to ivy league law and easily interacted with other black law students (despite our various cultural and social backgrounds and the fact that i was one of only about 4 hbcu grads there during my whole 3 year experience), but never found myself throwing myself into the activities, causes (sure we needed a more diverse faculty--but i had trouble complaining about the fact that there were only 20 women professors, when i knew there were only 2 black ones), or meetings of the women's association. as far as i could tell, many of the white women were no more like me than their male counterparts, with the exception of a few body parts. i know of 2 people who seemed as involved in blsa as in the women's association and i was duly fascinated by their ability to do so.
you see, it's not that i ever for a second underestimate the struggles associated with being a woman. i know it's hard and i know we've had to fight for our rights and the ability to sit at the table with the big boys. . .but i also know that i have womanly struggles and stereotypes that are unique to black women.
historically, black women were forced to put their 'women issues' on the back burner for the advancement of the race--we knew that the men would have to be able to walk through the door first and we were counting on them to bring them with us. the struggle for voting rights, for example, would have taken much longer if we had insisted on all of us having them at the same time. many black women have learned to see the uplifting of our race in tandem with the uplifting of "us" in general.
all this to say, i suspect this is why mccain didn't sway as many black women with the 'palin choice'--we can easily look at her and not see ourselves. and i was wondering 1) how hillary would have gone about wooing the black women voters--or if she would have taken us for granted, would it have been because of our democraticness or because of our womanness and 2) would black woman have been celebrating in the streets the way white women surely would have been at the announcement of a hillary presidential victory?